I was surprised to read a recent commentary in these
pages that suggested that the Kerasotes theater chain avoids films with gay
content — surprised because it isn’t true. Many have been
brought to Springfield by Kerasotes over the years, such as Philadelphia, Kiss of the Spider Woman, Mulholland Dr., and Bound. If Kerasotes dared to
screen Cruising at
the Esquire in 1980, then mild films such as Brokeback
Mountain and Capote, which are now playing here, could hardly frighten the
management. Granted, Cruising was not supported by the gay community, but its frank
depiction of a specific subculture is enough to send any homophobe running
for the nearest exit. I will never forget the obscene outburst from a guy
sitting behind me on opening night.
The subject of gay cinema is merely representative of
the bigger issue of independent and foreign films, and Kerasotes is the
prime target of criticism because it owns all of our local indoor theaters.
These complaints suggest a lack of understanding of the motion-picture and
theater business and the enormous changes the industry has undergone over
the last several decades. Like it or not, Springfield is not a major
market, and less commercial films do not draw well enough here. Obviously
as a film critic I would love to have more choices, but I’m also
practical enough to realize that no business is obligated to offer a
product that is likely to lose money. Those who argue that Kerasotes has an
obligation because it’s a local monopoly feed on the assumption that
a competitive market would result in the showing of a wider range of films
here. The history of Springfield’s theaters suggests otherwise.
I can’t go back to the very beginning, but I
can start with 1969, the year my family moved here. At that time there were
six indoor theaters — the Senate, the Esquire, the Lincoln, the Roxy,
the Fox, and the Frisina Cinema. Only the Senate and the Esquire were owned
by Kerasotes at the time. A few years later Kerasotes added two screens to
the Esquire and opened the Capital City Cinema. Later in the decade
Kerasotes divided the Senate into two screens and added a fourth to the
Esquire. White Oaks Cinema also opened near the end of the decade, but it
was not initially owned by Kerasotes. Competition clearly existed in the
1970s, but guess who offered most of the smaller-studio and foreign films?
That’s right, it was Kerasotes. Luis Buñuel’s The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie, François Truffaut’s Day
for Night, and Federico Fellini’s Amarcord all played at the
Esquire, as did Martin Scorsese’s small-studio film Mean Streets. Kerasotes offered
greater variety when they had competition, and their monopoly status
hasn’t altered their efforts.
What has changed since the ’70s is the market
itself. Audiences were more likely to buy tickets to small films back then,
but two major developments changed moviegoers’ habits. The release of
Jaws in 1975
ushered in the era of the blockbuster, which continues to drive the movie
industry. Before Jaws, most films were released slowly. Major cities would get them
first, and later they would filter out to the rest of the country. Even the
huge hits The Exorcist and The Sting were released that way. Universal bucked tradition by giving Jaws a massive nationwide
release, and its unprecedented success forever changed the course of
Hollywood. The blockbuster mentality has poisoned the minds of both the
industry and the public. If audiences supported small films, more would
receive wide releases. Demand rather than supply ultimately determines the
product.
The other major development is popularity of DVDs,
which appear to have put a much bigger dent in box office than the inferior
VHS format did. DVD better duplicates the theater experience. Now the
public’s thinking is “ ‘Big’ means theater;
‘small’ means DVD.”
So is it really Kerasotes’ fault that many
small films don’t reach Springfield? Of course not. It’s our
fault. Greater public support for these films would increase the number
brought here. What Springfield really needs is an art and retro theater,
one that can show films on a more limited basis. It simply doesn’t
pay to hold most of these films for a full week. What might work instead
are weekend screenings of independent, foreign, and classic films at a
venue such as the Hoogland Center for the Arts. For the time being
we’ll just have to make do with sporadic film series.
Illinois Times has provided readers with independent journalism for almost 50 years, from news and politics to arts and culture.
Your support will help cover the costs of editorial content published each week. Without local news organizations, we would be less informed about the issues that affect our community..
Click here to show your support for community journalism.