Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Julie Rea has never changed her story. Ever since October 13, 1997, when her
10-year-old son, Joel Kirkpatrick, was murdered in his sleep, Rea has claimed
the killer was an intruder who entered her home in the wee hours of the morning,
took a knife from her kitchen, and killed her child. Authorities in Lawrence
County didn’t believe Rea and instead focused on her as their suspect. In 2002,
she was convicted of murder and sentenced to 65 years in prison.

But in a book published in April, serial killer Tommy Lynn Sells, imprisoned
on Texas’ Death Row, voluntarily confessed to killing Joel Kirkpatrick [see
Illinois Times’ July 24 cover story, “Who Killed Joel?” at www.illinoistimes.com].
Sells has been convicted of killing two young girls in Texas, and he was indicted
earlier this month for the October 15, 1997, abduction, rape, and murder of
a young girl in Springfield, Missouri.

Since July, the Downstate Illinois Innocence Project based at the University of Illinois at Springfield has been investigating both Sells’ confession and Rea’s account of the murder.

Earlier this week, at a statehouse press conference, the project’s investigators announced their findings. Investigator Bill Clutter presented quotes from taped interviews with several witnesses who encountered a man matching Sells’ description in and around Lawrenceville in the days before and after the murder.

One witness is Alan Berkshire, who says he ate dinner with his family at the Lawrenceville Drive Inn on October 11, 1997. Berkshire recalls meeting a “drifter with problems”–a man who was “disoriented” and “twitchy.” Berkshire believed the man was drunk or on drugs, but he was more concerned about the attention he focused on Berkshire’s then-11-year-old son, Rusty, and other children who came into the restaurant. In a conversation, the drifter told Berkshire he had family in Arizona but had been working in St. Louis (Sells lived in Arizona briefly, and had been working in St. Louis just days before this encounter).

Berkshire tried to see where the drifter went when he left, and concluded he had gone over to the railroad tracks. Rea and her son lived in a subdivision just beyond those tracks.

After Joel Kirkpatrick’s murder, Berkshire went to the sheriff’s office to report his encounter with this man, but no one followed up on his tip.

Berkshire’s description matches Sells, even in details that have not been publicized. For example, Berkshire described the drifter as a nail-biter, but not “a continual biter,” saying he chewed his nails, especially while looking around.

Diane Fanning, the author of Through the Window, the book about Sells, says the serial killer does indeed chew his naills, but not constantly. “He’s more of a gnaw-on-the-edge kind of person,” she says.

On the night of October 14, another witness, Sandra Wirth, encountered a man resembling the intruder Rea described. The man appeared at the Greyhound bus terminal where Wirth worked in Princeton, Indiana, just a short train ride southeast of Lawrenceville, and purchased a ticket to a tiny town Wirth had never heard of–Winnemucca, Nevada. He said he needed to see his mother. The route went through St. Louis (where Sells’ mother lives), with another stop scheduled for Denver before reaching Nevada. Wirth alerted police about this man, and they had officers meet the bus in Denver. The man wasn’t on it.

Sells has confessed to and been indicted for a murder in Springfield, Missouri, that occurred late the next night. He resurfaced two months later, according to Texas Rangers, in Winnemucca, Nevada.

After the press conference, Rea’s relatives delivered a petition for executive
clemency, citing the new information, to the office of Governor Rod Blagojevich.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Mr. Sells was especially deplorable because he assaulted/ killed children. Everyone knows that children are precious. He just didn’t have any empathy for them.

    My own kids are being abused. They are being sex trafficked by my former attorney. Because this person is a lawyer, many people in my community don’t see the criminal acts being on par with those of a street pimp. Even the District Attorney has failed to stop this lawyer or protect my children. The criminal activity also includes assaults against me, but the D.A. has preferred to file charges against ME. No crime was even committed. The intention was to quickly bring the matter to competency proceedings in order to discredit my reports of child molestation. The D.A.’s Office didn’t care what that meant for my kids.

    Even the State Bar refused to stop the attorney. I even included pictures of the injuries that I sustained, social media threats and sick messages pertaining to child molestation.

    You can read the complaint and dismissal here:

    https://pdfhost.io/v/jM.L2FJRQ_Petition_for_Review_State_Bar_decision

    The State Bar of my state claims that the attorney did not violate the code of ethics and referred the matter to the D.A.’s Office.

    Every law enforcement officer should be acting in the same way that Texas did in the Snell case. No child should be left behind, no matter whether an attorney is involved.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *