Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

 At the Downtown Springfield Inc. annual awards
dinner in January at the Wyndham City Centre, the Springfield Mayre Jim
Langfelder talked about the most recent developments in the Bluffstone LLC
proposal to build student housing downtown, which I wrote about it in “Doing
development right
.”

The city council, you might remember, chose not to grant the
controversial firm the $700,000 in tax increment money it requested for the
Fourth and Madison project, funding that the developer called critical.

Apparently Bluffstone will build anyway. I noted at the time
that while the “no” vote didn’t kill the project, it probably would change it, and
probably not in good ways.
After the vote, Bluffstone hinted that they
might make up the lost $700,000 in city money by squeezing the construction
budget, which they have done by downsizing the building from five stories to
four. But we know little more about what those four stories will be like than
we did before.   

A city can’t regenerate a downtown by just opening
it to developers and hoping for the best. Development needs to be shaped,
nudged, occasionally bullied by conscientious regulators into forms that meets
the larger needs of the city. Expecting projects to meet code isn’t enough;
code-compliant buildings can be ugly and inconvenient and bad neighbors,
because Springfield’s codes don’t address ugly and inconvenient and neighborly.

Unfortunately, the capital city has no formal design
review process. Complaints about the bulk, height, and facades of proposed
buildings get talked about, if they get talked about at all, in public zoning
hearings. For objectors who wish to raise issues with aesthetic, green or transit dimensions, that’s a little like suing for divorce in traffic court.

The aldermen had foolishly granted zoning approval
for a building they hadn’t yet seen. Their decision not to make the city a finance partner
also removed a lever the city could have used to pry a
better building out of the company. We will have to hope for the best. That
isn’t a very good way to build a city.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *