The Springfield City Council refused to advance a measure out of committee that would require landlords to register their properties with the city. Among Illinois’ 10 largest cities, only Springfield, Naperville and Champaign do not have such a requirement.
Ward 3 Ald. Roy Williams Jr., sponsor of the ordinance, said registration would make it easier to monitor and police owners of vacant lots, abandoned houses and landlords who do not maintain their houses. He said that when the organization Springfield Inner City Older Neighborhoods conducted a survey of candidates before the April 2023 local election, some council members said they were in favor. A review of the Springfield ICON survey shows that in response to the question: “Would you support a city ordinance requiring all landlords renting property in the city to register annually with the city providing local contact information and proof of garbage service?” Mayor Misty Buscher, Ald. Shawn Gregory and Ald. Jim Donelan said “no,” while Ald. Roy Williams Jr., Ald. Larry Rockford, Ald. Lakeisha Purchase, Ald. Jennifer Notariano, Ald. Brad Carlson and Ald. Erin Conley said “yes.” The other current council members did not answer the survey.
At the May 30 Committee of the Whole meeting, council members decided whether to advance the registration proposal for debate and vote. Ald. Ralph Hanauer, who voted not to advance the measure, said such a list is unnecessary and asked director of Public Works David Fuchs why the city would spend resources implementing such a program when landlords’ names can be obtained through property records. Fuchs replied that the problem lies in locating and serving some landlords with court papers, particularly out-of-state landlords. The registration ordinance proposed by Williams would require that any out-of-state owners of rental properties to have a local agent for receiving violation notices, and that corporate owners maintain contact information for all officers and partners of the company as well.
Seven of Illinois’ 10 largest cities require landlords to register with the city, and half have special registration requirements for vacant properties. Marti Ryan, president of the McLean County Area Landlord Association and a Bloomington real estate agent, says she supports Bloomington’s and Normal’s requirements that landlords register with the city. “As a landlord, you hope that other landlords are doing the right thing, but not all do,” she said. “The registration requirement also helps community associations identify owners who are renting in violation of community rules.”
Williams told Illinois Times that neglect of investor-owned properties is an acute problem in his ward, where he estimates that 80 percent of residents do not own the homes they live in. This makes issues like overgrown grass and fly dumping harder to solve because there is no owner at the property to cite or serve with legal papers. “I appreciate the perspective of my fellow aldermen who are opposed to this measure, but they represent districts where most property owners can be found by knocking on the door,” he said. In his ward, he says, those owners must be tracked down, delaying the process of remediating distressed properties. He told his fellow council members that a constituent said raccoons and other animals living in a vacant house next door harassed them during their Memorial Day cookout. “No one should have to deal with that,” he said.
Hanauer said current rules are adequate, but “we aren’t hitting [noncompliant landlords] hard enough,” and it takes “three to four years” to tear down dilapidated houses. He said he wants to see the city pick up the pace of demolitions, because vacant houses attract vagrants who sometimes start fires, putting first responders in danger. He also said he didn’t think it good for neighborhood associations to have access to a list of landlords because they could “bother the landlords, or whatever, if something’s not kept up to their standards…. I don’t know if that’s necessarily a good thing.”
As proposed, the ordinance would only apply to single buildings with 50 or more units or to properties with 10 or more total units in two or more buildings. Conley said the ordinance wouldn’t address the issue of dilapidated single-family homes and suggested forming a working group of no more than three council members to refine the proposed ordinance with advice from corporate counsel and the public works director.
Ward 2 Ald. Gregory, Ward 3 Ald. Williams, Ward 4 Ald. Rockford and Ward 6 Ald. Notariano voted to advance the proposal from committee to debate, while Ward 1 Ald. Redpath, Ward 5 Ald. Purchase, Ward 7 Ald. Carlson, Ward 8 Ald. Conley, Ward 9 Ald. Donelan and Ward 10 Ald. Hanauer voted against, so the measure failed. It needed seven votes to pass.
Don Howard is an intern at Illinois Times while completing his master’s degree in Public Affairs Reporting at University of Illinois Springfield. He can be reached at dhoward@illinoistimes.com or 336-455-6966.
This article appears in Habitat helps families, one homebuyer at a time.


“He also said he didn’t think it good for neighborhood associations to have access to a list of landlords because they could “bother the landlords, or whatever, if something’s not kept up to their standards…. I don’t know if that’s necessarily a good thing.” – So in Ralph’s view only homeowners who live in the home can be bothered by their HOA about upkeep of the home? LOL. This is such a hypocritical moronic statement. But, that’s what I have come to expect from the guy in seat #10.
Hold landlords accountable. They OWN the property. Tenants don’t own the property and a majority of the time are not tasked with the upkeep.
Our new mayor and many other councilmembers ran on “transparency”… WHY are they trying so hard to not come in line with what a majority of our comparable cities in Illinois are doing and make this information transparent? Strange…
Ald. Ralph Hanauer, who voted not to advance the measure, said such a list is unnecessary and asked director of Public Works David Fuchs why the city would spend resources implementing such a program when landlords’ names can be obtained through property records. Fuchs replied that the problem lies in locating and serving some landlords with court papers, particularly out-of-state landlords.
So Hanauer asks director Fuchs and he says that there is a problem BUT Hanauer still doesn’t agree and votes no. Why have directors? Hanauer wants to hit non-compliant landlords harder. How if you can’t locate them! I see it as taxpayers have 2 choices: Get rid of directors, who want to solve the problem, but the council is not listening to them (which would save on payroll and benefits). Or get rid of alderman who continue to enable the problem. I like the 2nd choice myself.
It seems odd that these alderman are so adamant on keeping what seems like a common sense proposal out of debate- something doesn’t add up…
Just another tool to harass landlords. How about we maintain a list of deadbeat tenants and of those who tear up their rental units?
Look up the tax bill it states who the owner/responsible for the property .
Enforce the rules that are already on the books
Require all of Alders to actually READ, UNDERSTAND and enforce what is already the rule before passing any new ordnance
.It was quite clear last meeting that Ward 9 Jim Donelan Ward 10 Ralph Hanauer had no idea or understood what they voted on in 2016.
What’s even worse is we pay the salary and retirement for these do nothings !
If they don’t want to take the time to read the city Ordnance book they should get off the council!
Bringing new private jobs, low taxes takes care of a lot of these problems. .More government programs or wasting tax money on them do not!!
Thanks everyone for engaging in this issue and for supporting local journalism.
Unfortunately, finding a property owner through the tax records is not as easy as it ought to be. For example, if I go to the Sangamon County Parcel Search website and enter the address 213 Eastman Avenue, the owner comes up as R&R Capital Holdings, LLC. But there is no such LLC registered with the Illinois Secretary of State. Turns out it’s a Florida LLC which was delicensed then reinstated in 2022. Its home is 777 Brickell Avenue, 5th floor, in an office building in Miami. There is more than one office on the 5th floor, and we don’t know which one.
So you might serve someone at that address, but how can you be sure that you have the right person? The agent is one Daniel Rosario, but what if he’s not there? If you are an administrator with the city of Springfield, how do you know you’ve followed all the proper rules in Dade County Florida to effectuate service of process? Does the delicensing and reinstatement of the LLC have any effect on the legality of the service of process? If you make one mistake, you have to start the process over again.
What registration of owners would do is require those who own rental property to have a local agent for service of process on file with the city. An ordinance might provide that the owner agrees that certified mail sent to the registered address is effective notice for violations. This would save the city a huge amount of resources, uncertainty and time in pursuing violators.
213 Eastman is on the demolition eligible list pursuant to a complaint filed in 2018.