Sam is a handsome lad caught in a love triangle between a local politician and the woman with whom he has resided for five years.
His two love interests say he has captured their hearts and they don’t want the other to have him.
Sam, aka Buddy, is a dog.

Edinah Lincoln, a retired Springfield rehabilitation therapist, and Pam Deppe, a Republican on the Sangamon County Board, each say they are the rightful owner to the Havanese pooch.
Lincoln, who is 78 and lives alone, said her social life revolved around the animal. She said she would walk him three to five miles every day and talk with neighbors and other dog walkers along her route in Washington Park.
Now that Sam doesn’t live with her, she says she no longer has a reason to leave the house.
But Deppe said the dog, which she has renamed Buddy, was legally adopted from the pound. She added she loves him and has no intention of giving him back to his former owner.
Soon the legal fur may be flying. And caught in the crossfire is Sangamon County Animal Control.
On May 20, Lincoln experienced a health emergency; medical personnel carried her unconscious from her home and she was taken to a St. Louis hospital for immediate aortic surgery.

Later that day, a Springfield police lieutenant and a locksmith were dispatched to the house to help an animal control officer take the pooch to the pound.
Kala Wells, a neighbor, said the day the ambulance left Lincoln’s house she was contacted by someone from Animal Control who told her that Lincoln wasn’t expected to live and asked if she would like to have the dog.
“I already had two puppies and they said she wasn’t going to live, so I told them to just find a good home for him,” she said. But she later added if she had known that her neighbor would return home, she would have been happy to foster him.
Animal Control Director Jeanne Keenan said she tried to call Lincoln while she was in the hospital but was told by a nurse that she was not coherent.
“She said that the patient was very disoriented. I did not feel comfortable starting a conversation about an owned animal with a person that was disoriented. So, I did not do that. The nurse told us about a brother who lived in Utah and gave us his phone number. We reached out to the brother,” said Keenan.
The brother, John Lincoln, said he spoke on the telephone with someone from Animal Control named Sheila on May 23 and told her he couldn’t afford to have the canine flown to Utah, where he lives. But he said he did tell her he would be willing to pay as much as $50 a day to have the dog boarded locally until his sister was released from the hospital.
“Basically, the woman told me they couldn’t do this and that this is an owner-relinquished animal that has to be given up after seven days,” he said.
Animal Control director Keenan said if there had been an offer to pay to board the dog, they certainly would have considered it.
“We could maybe have set up something to have the animal taken care of outside of the facility so that they could keep the dog until she got better,” she said.
But Keenan added she doesn’t believe such an offer to pay for boarding was ever made. She added it is her understanding that John Lincoln gave permission for the animal to be relinquished.
Michelle Bretscher, practice manager for Coble Animal Hospital, said the amount John Lincoln contends he offered to pay would easily have covered the cost of private boarding in the community. She said basic boarding at her facility is $20 a day.
A Jacksonville nurse who was caring for Lincoln in the St. Louis hospital also called Animal Control that week and offered to foster the dog. But according to notes obtained by Illinois Times under the Freedom of Information Act, Animal Control officials told her she needed to coordinate such a fostering with John Lincoln – not Animal Control.
“At that point, we didn’t own the dog and couldn’t make arrangements for it,” Keenan said.
What is not in dispute is that during a second phone call on June 1, John Lincoln said he did not want the dog given away. The pound still had physical possession of the canine when he called, but the May 30 deadline for the family to reclaim it had passed. And by then, an arrangement had been made for Pam Deppe to adopt the dog.

Although Deppe is a member of the Sangamon County Board and Animal Control is one of the agencies it oversees, both Keenan and her boss, Public Health Director Gail O’Neill, say she was not given any preferential treatment.
Both Lincoln and her neighbor, Kala Wells, expressed skepticism at this claim.
Lincoln said she purchased the purebred dog from an Ohio breeder for $800 five years ago and paid another $200 to have it transported to Springfield.
When Deppe adopted the dog, she paid a $50 adoption fee. But she said that doesn’t tell the whole story of how much she has spent on him. She said since the adoption she paid to have a Chatham veterinarian treat him for an ear infection and for a groomer to have some matted fur removed. She added when she and her husband went on vacation, she paid for her brother to fly to Springfield from Arizona to dog sit both of her pets.
She added she prepares custom meals for her dogs each day, has given the dog a new name that he answers to and that he now insists on sleeping every night next to her husband.
Deppe said she intends to keep the animal because she believes hers is the best home for him.
Lincoln is consulting with a lawyer to try to regain her pooch. The civil division of the Sangamon County State’s Attorney’s office also has been contacted by Animal Control officials about the matter.
Lincoln said she wonders why Deppe doesn’t just make a gesture of kindness and return the dog.
She added, “She doesn’t have empathy, so that defines a sociopath.”
This article appears in Housing first.

Shame!
What a disservice to the truth……..
The dog belongs to Miss Lincoln
Scott, prepare to bask in the glory of your remarkable achievement! Your exceptional political story has emerged as one of the absolute finest narratives to grace the illustrious realm of Sangamon County. Introducing a gripping tale of power, betrayal, and the unbreakable bond between a sick elderly woman and her beloved canine companion. Brace yourself as we delve into the shocking world of politics, where an influential figure from the esteemed Sagamon County GOP party commits an audacious act that will leave you on the edge of your seat. In this heart-wrenching narrative, we witness the unimaginable as a precious dog is snatched away from its vulnerable owner. Unleashing a wave of emotions, this captivating story will take you on a rollercoaster ride of suspense and intrigue Discover the captivating narrative surrounding the enigmatic Sangamon County animal shelter, a sanctuary entangled in a web of scandal and turmoil.
It seems anyone in Deppe’s position would automatically want to do the right thing.
My husband and myself have been working on an acceptable return of Ms Lincoln’s dog. We have had the dog to the vet twice, the groomers twice and started allergy pills on 8-23-23 for him. Although he is only 5 years old, he has a bad left eye cataract, his fur was matted to his skin requiring 6.5 hours at the groomers on his first visit, and ear infections with one ear severely infected which has cleared up with twice daily medication. Our priority was for him to be healthy. As I told you in our interview, I would rather have the public upset with me than to judge her for the care of the dog. We all love this dog.
My idea for Ms Lincoln and to return “Sammy” would be for a conservatorship with you and your wife concerning Sammy’s health. As stated in your article all she has is Sammy, and with a conservatorship you and your wife would be able to check on her monthly, help her with any concerns dealing with his health and take Sammy if Ms Lincoln has a medical emergency again. This is very important so none of us would have to go through this emotional situation ever again.
You could also send us updates and occasional pictures of Sammy. Although it is very difficult to give him up, we feel that with you, your wife and all the people who has voiced concern and judgement can now assist Ms Lincoln and Sammy daily if needed.
Please contact us once you can speak with Ms Lincoln and offer your service. Then you can happily deliver Sammy back home.
Hopefully, everyone will have a contingency plan for their pets.
Pam Deppe
In accordance with my non-legal expertise, it is my subjective viewpoint that the proposal in question seems to possess a reasonable nature. However, it is imperative to emphasize that I do not possess the qualifications of a legal professional. Notwithstanding, in the event that it can be substantiated that the proprietor of the canine was not accorded the requisite procedural safeguards within the designated timeframe and in accordance with the established legal protocols, it is incumbent upon the county to assume the financial obligations of the proposed conservatorship.
I remember Leona Helmsley had a similar conservatorship arrangement when she was sent to prison.
Furthermore, the question regarding the special influences given to an elected official, board member, or county employee. Was the public given the opportunity to adopt the dog through a public listing or portal, if necessary? Given the seriousness of the allegations, it would be prudent for the county board to conduct an external investigation into these claims. Are county employees and elected officials allowed to do business with the County?
Are County officials legally permitted to engage in the acquisition of real estate through the utilization of insider transactions? Are there any regulations or statutes in place that prohibit or restrict the engagement in insider trading or the occurrence of conflicts of interest? Based on the available information, it is imperative to ascertain whether any breaches of ethical rules have occurred.
Perhaps, since Mrs. Deppe and her husband have been working on an acceptable return of Sammy, they would consider the conservatorship they suggested to the author of the article? I mean, obviously she is very concerned about Sammy’s care prior to his being confiscated. Never mind that in the adoption picture Sammy looked totally healthy and not substantially overgrown. (We have all seen photos of neglected dogs, and this picture did not show a neglected dog.) Maybe he was in need of grooming, but dogs like Havanese and Shih Tzus need regular grooming, and Sammy had obviously been groomed previously. He has a cataract, in spite of being only 5 years old? Well, cataracts are usually a genetic trait or due to a medical condition like diabetes, but certainly not due to neglect. He had ear infections? My dachshunds got ear infections regularly, every summer, and I have always been a devoted and caring owner. The implication is that Sammy was not cared for by Ms. Lincoln (in spite of Mrs. Deppe’s claim that she didn’t want her to be judged), and yet he was deemed adoptable by SCAC with no treatment, and he was apparently up to date on immunizations, and already neutered and chipped. However, since Mrs. Deppe has such pressing concerns about returning Sammy to the care of Ms. Lincoln, a conservatorship could just be the answer for her. That way, she and her husband can remain in contact and do welfare checks on Sammy, thus assuring themselves that he will not be neglected in the future.
I saw my Mom and other relatives this weekend and I told them about this issue. They all agreed the dog should be given back to Mrs. Lincoln who did pay for the dog. Too bad those first responders told the neighbor that Mrs. Lincoln would not make it. Sure she had a real bad health problem, many have died of it. Obviously there is better treatment now. Her neighbor would have taken it during the time Mrs. Lincoln was in the hospital and recovery. Ms. Deppe should care and give it back. Like any Jesus believers.
This is the most Chatham story of all-time. Really not surprising. They’ll probably promote her to Mayor!
Give the lady back her dog!!!!
Seriously how low can you go even after getting the full story?!?
It’s pathetic that strangers have to tell you to do what’s right but your own brain says to keep an elderly lady’s dog?
In the end the only thing you’re doing is hurting yourself and your own reputation. What happened to what your parents taught you? First things you were taught young was to do what’s right. Unfortunately you must feel entitled to think you deserve anything from the original owner. She survived death she doesn’t owe you shit but for you to return her dog and disappear. You should have other things to do than to stalk the lady…just saying. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you…
The Deppe’s should think of themselves as fosters. The dog belongs to Mrs Lincoln and it is time to return him. Grace should be given from both sides.
There is no such thing as a “conservatorship” for a dog. A conservatorship is a court order that appoints someone to oversee the financial affairs of a person who is incapacitated. What an insult for a person of sound mind and walking Sam 5 miles a day to have a stranger coming in their home to check on their dog.
She paid $50 for a purebred dog from a shelter? What is the normal adoption fee and how many others we’re attempting to adopt Sammy?? Something is off here..shame on the Deppe’s and the animal shelter!!
The OWNER did not give person for animal control to adopt her dog out. The assumption that Ms Lincoln was not going to return to her home was pure speculation. I don’t believe a word that the adopter has a conscience or empathy for anyone but herself. Give that dog back to Ms Lincoln!