• Tue
    18
  • Wed
    19
  • Thu
    20
  • Fri
    21
  • Sat
    22
  • Sun
    23
  • Mon
    24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / News /  Reformers: sex offender mandate would hurt Illinois
. . . .
Thursday, April 19,2012

Reformers: sex offender mandate would hurt Illinois

Other states shrugging off law because of costs

By Patrick Yeagle
As Illinois lawmakers debate a bill to increase registration requirements for sex offenders under a federal mandate, reform advocates say it would cost the state too much. They say many other states have declined to enact the federal law for the same reason.

Currently, most sex offenders in Illinois are required to register for 10 years. Among other provisions, Senate Bill 3359 would increase that to 15 years for less serious crimes and 25 years for more serious crimes. Sex offenders who don’t register or don’t update their address or other information would then have to register for life. It would also require offenders to register while traveling

The bill is intended to bring Illinois into compliance with the federal Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.  State Sen. William Haine, D-Alton, sponsors the bill and has pushed similar bills in previous legislative sessions. A phone call seeking comment from Haine was not returned.

But a handful of groups in Illinois oppose the law, saying it would actually decrease public safety by concentrating police resources on sex offenders – many of whom are unlikely to reoffend. In Illinois’ currently tight budget situation, reformers are also raising the issue of the cost of implementing tighter requirements.

Tonia Maloney, director of Illinois Voices for Reform, points to a study by the Justice Policy Institute, a national think tank, which estimates Illinois would spend nearly $21 million to implement the Adam Walsh Act, but would reap less than $1 million in federal grants tied to the law.

“We’re really, really broke over here, and I think they need to look at that a little more,” Maloney says.

Thirty-five other states have declined to implement the federal law because it costs more to implement than the penalty for not doing so. The National Conference of State Legislatures says only 15 states have implemented the law, and many states continue to struggle with issues the law would create, such as in-person registration requirements, the length of time juveniles would stay on the registry, and retroactive punishment for offenders already serving their sentences.

Mary Dixon, legislative director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, says Ohio’s adoption of the Adam Walsh provisions has spurred about 7,000 individual challenges to the law in that state’s courts. Dixon said one Ohio court found that the law violates the U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of due process.

“You’ll have adults who finished nine-and-a-half years (on the registry) with no new offense and no new violation, who then are bumped to 25 years,” Dixon says. “This means not only that you have to register X number of times per year for all of those additional years, but that all of the additional laws apply: you can’t be in certain places, you can’t have certain jobs, you can’t be around kids. Right now, we have a high level of compliance with our registration laws – around 93 percent – and this creates a very bleak long-term picture for people who are otherwise compliant.”

Haine’s bill would allow a sex offender to petition for removal from the registry if the victim was between 13 and 17 years old and the offender was less than five years older than the victim. That’s a common situation in Illinois, known as a “Romeo and Juliet” relationship, and a bill to decriminalize it in Illinois failed in the previous legislative session. Under Haine’s bill, the ability to petition for removal from the registry would only kick in after the offender served 10 years on the registry, however, effectively exempting them from the increased registration term of 15 years.

Maloney says that doesn’t do enough to distinguish between offenders who are likely to reoffend and those who aren’t.

“If people don’t know anybody on the registry, they believe they’re all child molesters who are going to reoffend,” Maloney says. “We’re trying to show that there is a difference between actual child molesters and young people who just made a mistake.”

Contact Patrick Yeagle at pyeagle@illinoistimes.com.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
Does the name Jerry Sandusky ring a bell??? For those of you not familiar he is at the center of the Penn State sex abuse scandal. Make sure you remember what I am about to say if nothing else regarding the pending legislation....Jerry Sandusky was NOT ON ANY SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY. Which is the case in more than 95% of sexual offenses. What about that do you not understand?? More laws....more money being thrown at a failed system is irresponsible. I will go even further in saying, based on current and future bills of this nature, any child or teen who is sexually abused by a person NOT ON any SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY should sue the Illinois State Legislature as well as any other entity involved in this hype for FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY IN THE 1st DEGREE.

You do realize there are over 763,000 men, women and children required to register across the states for everything from urinating in public, streaking, mooning, exposure, sexting, viewing suggestive or abusive images of anyone up to the age of 18, playing doctor, prostitution, false accusations by a soon-to-be ex-wife, ex-girlfriend or angry and immature student, Romeo & Juliet consensual sexual dating relationships, endangering the welfare of a child, rape and many other "crimes." You are weaving a horrible web. Please do the math... 763,000 multiplied by 3 or 4 family members...wives, children, mothers, grandmothers, girlfriends, aunts and other loved ones that are suffering the collateral damage by being harassed, ridiculed, threatened, beaten, wives lose their jobs, asked to leave their church and other organizations, have to move, have signs placed in their yards, have flyers distributed throughout the neighborhood....all because they are trying to provide a support system for someone who has paid their debt to society and wants to work and support their family....that's all. Keep adding more laws and "you" or someone you love will soon be awarded a place on the registry. Education is the key! Use these funds to teach parents, teens and children about sexual safety to include behavior that is appropriate toward them as well as behavior that is appropriate coming from them. Very Important!
Vicki Henry
Women Against Registry dot com

 

 
Take a long look at Ohio over the past 5 years. Re-evaluate ANY and ALL legislation on this topic BEFORE it turns out that same way as it has in Ohio. I will not post any links to any research here, do it yourself so as I can not bias you.
Search these suggestions are based all out of Ohio of course:
Costs of AWA initial and subsequent implementation.
The cost of compliance with the Federal rules.
Number of lawsuits against the AWA.
Cost of those lawsuits.
Effectiveness of the AWA Tiering system vs. Megan's Law.
How many parts of the AWA have been deemed either unconstitutional or inapplicable to offenders, AND WHY!!! (That is my main point for the Legislators.)
That is just a start of things to search.
Remember, what is legislated today MAY be "checked" in a Court later, and if not by a Court, then by the public for effectiveness in general, and also intended effectiveness vs. real cost. ("Feel good" doesn't always "make safe.")
Big issues to consider for a state with limited/waning budgets.

 

 
; my husbands name is Mark Perk ,) i saw a sex offender show on march 17, 2010 about the horrendous case of a small child raped by someone who was on the sex offender registry and the extensive damage he inflicted on the family and the whole tragic issue of sexual predators.



my husband is on the sex offender registry for having a consensual relationship with me,his wife, in 1998.,im now 29!!!!!We now have 3 beautiful children.There is an answer to the question ",why cant the police watch these guys and prevent future horrors."?
The answer is not what people want to hear as this subject is driven by hysteria and knee jerk legislation to appease a roman colliseum, mob type mentality.



There are thousands and thousands of consensual,statutory cases on the sex offender registry in each state,Plus juvenille cases(19 year olds with 15 year olds) ,public nudity,exposure,prostitution,indecent behavior,public peeing etc.



There simply are not enough police to monitor all these cases. Because the states wont interject risk assessment hearings, all sex offender registrants are lumped together and there simply isnt enough police power to monitor all registrants,nor should they.!!!!!!!!
IWe have been on television numerous times on this subject. I know what my husband did is socially taboo and illegal, yet he is not a threat to children or women.To put him next to a child rapist on this list, is like putting a casual marijuanna smoker ,caught with a bag, in the same arena s a meth lab gangster!!!!!!!. (as a result we have been on the Donny Deutch show and have had numerous articles in newspapers on our behalf)



List of police time waisted on my case:


my husband been on this list for 11 plus years,ive had 100 plus probation appointments,40 plus home checks,done over 17 police station check ins,police monitoring our home frequently,pulled over (with my wife,both of us in cuffs)11 plus times etc.Stickers on our home on Halloween,lost 6 jobs,various acts of vigilantism etc.



We have had DCFS called on us 3 times by an anonynous neighbor because im on the list and have had numerous threatening calls to our home. Addittionally we have had to call the Crestwood Police and bother them numerous times because of suspicious cars in front of our home, snapping pictures,gawking etc.All this police time for one consensual case ,AND WE ARE MARRIED .!!!!
(

We were married by the same judge who gave me the original misdimeanor,who did not consider me a threat!!! He later helped seal our case to "protect this family and the children" )



If the public is wondering why law enforcement cant even stop violent registered offenders from re-offending,the answer is that these predators are like a pin hiding in a haystack.The haystack is thousands of non violent cases like mine, that would be removed immediately if risk assessment was employed.



No media figure has the courage to tell it straight: time to weed out the predators from the registrants who simply broke the law. Then the police can triple their time up on monitoring violent offenders.( Its not the police who make these laws its the congressional and Governor wannabes,who want to appear to look "tough on crime.",yet have no clue of the ramifications of their legilation on families nor care.)



Its always the same pattern, the media likes to cry wolf,get the public excited (for sensationalism)and then the lawmakers legislate an already blotted system ,while the real predators know this and use it in their hunting techniques as camoflague.


look up Mark Perk, l Google in" Lets seperate the Misguided from the monsters" Eric Zorn ,Chicago tribune. This is our story.



our daughter is 4 years old,ironically I am as scared as anyone of true sexual predators. The story of any young child raped is heart breaking ,frightening yet tragically will happen time and time again. No one has the courage to seperate the wheat from the chaff.or the "misguided from the monsters".



Krissy Perk


 

 
people hate sex offenders. regardless of whatever conditions you allow. the ones that have been victimized will never be satisfied with any punishments handed out. so there really is no point of making things worse for them. the majority of them have learned their lessons and won't ever re-offfend.
now the laws in place now currently do the following: 1) they make it impossible for sex offenders to find jobs, keep jobs, have money, and live normal lives again. now do all of these 740,000 people have to be punished harshly due to the deaths of four kids? i would say not. Those kids are dead and making life impossilbe for people classified as sex offenders will not bring them back to life. 2) we repeal megan's law. nobody needs to know who got arrested and what he did in the past. It violates privacy, 14th amendment, 9th amendment, and most iimportantly is ex post facto or bill of attainder. 3) we change CORI to a shorter time for people convicted of a single sex offense - what that time limit is is debatable. but the one thing that is not debatable is that once you are cori as a sex offender its impossible to make a living and support yourself. 4) people who have no opportunity for making money cannot be successful citizens of this country. 5) we make it easy for all tier 2 sex offenders to get off registry after a reasonable period of time.- 2yrs, 5yr, 7yrs, 10yrs. whatever. once you are off the registry you information gets sealed for life automatically.

 

yes its right. stray animals have more opportunities and rights and privileges than most sex offenders now. its time to take our country back from these vigilantees called politicians and public safety sycophants. sue them and sue them now. it costs 450 dollars in most states.and if youre successful u can get your legal fees back. and you dont even need a lawyer. the legislature does not have the power to pass out punishment. its a violation of separation of powers clause in the constitution or amendments. anyone convicted of failure to register or failure to do anything can state that the laws cant be enforced because you can only be punished by judges and juries and not the clowns who work in the legislative branch. dont even waste your time obeying any laws now since they are all 100% illegal and unconstitutional. you have no representation in govt now. its time to start dumping the tea back into the harbors. stray pets are being treated more humanely than anyone convicted of a sexual offense dating back to 1901. there is no statute of limitations for sexual offenses but there are statute of limitations for anything related to your constitutional rights. stand up and let your voice be heard in this country. fight these people where they have no strengths in federal district court. you cant be punished twice in this country once by a judge and once by the legistlature. the sex offender registry and all of its rules are as remedial as the dropping of the atomic bomb was remedial to nagasaki and hiroshima. dont let public safety and the legislature tell you how you can live your life. its yours and not theirs. kennedy v. martinez-mendoza. remember that case it may save your life. dont vote for any politicians that passed megans law. get them ousted and replaced by people who arent more sympathetic to dogs than sex offenders. contact me at diehard25fl@yahoo.com and tell me how you can help in removing these laws permanently. thanks.