• Sat
    25
  • Sun
    26
  • Mon
    27
  • Tue
    28
  • Wed
    29
  • Thu
    30
  • Fri
    31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / News /  Who are we adopting?
. . . .
Friday, February 17,2012

Who are we adopting?

Parents say DCFS leaves them in the dark

By Patrick Yeagle

Tammy Herstad feels like a failure. A mother of three adopted sons and one biological daughter in the Chicago suburb of Bartlett, Herstad spends much of her time worrying about her adopted son, Adam. The 9-year-old has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and other emotional disturbances that manifest in violent, destructive behavior at the slightest provocation.

 “Right after the adoption, he fell off the deep end,” Herstad says. “He would wake up in the middle of night and destroy things. He would take (his brother) Abel’s diabetes syringes and stick them in things. He would break glass, he would hurt our dogs, he couldn’t sit in his seat anymore. He was hearing voices…(he was) aggressive, violent. It was just absolutely crazy.”

Herstad says she feels like she failed Adam because her love and parenting skills weren’t enough to stop his damaging and dangerous behavior. But Tammy Herstad also feels let down herself. She says she wasn’t warned about Adam’s bipolar disorder, reactive attachment disorder and other issues. And she’s not the only one who feels left out of the loop.

Illinois Times spoke with five families in Springfield and around the state who say the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, along with the private agencies with which DCFS contracts, fails to give families the full picture concerning the children they adopt. Undisclosed tendencies toward violence and self-harm can lead adoptive families to throw up their hands in desperation, jeopardizing the future of an adopted child.

Does DCFS keep potentially explosive information from adoptive parents or offer promises it doesn’t keep? The answer is nuanced, but not very comforting.


The scope of the problem    

Mental illness among children in foster care is a common problem. A March 2010 report from the Illinois Department of Human Services says nearly 45,000 children and adults up to age 21 in Illinois received mental health services from state-supported agencies in 2009. Of those, more than 18,000 children and young adults were classified as having a severe emotional disorder that impairs their ability to function in social, family and educational situations. About two percent of those with severe emotional disturbances receive long-term residential treatment, and another two percent receive intensive treatment in their homes. DCFS spokesman Kendall Marlowe says there are currently about 15,000 children in the foster care system in Illinois.

The Child Welfare League of America says about 6.1 million children lived with parents who abused alcohol or other drugs as of 2001. The effect on children of alcohol or drug abuse by a parent is staggering: children whose parents abuse drugs and alcohol are almost three times more likely to be abused and four times more likely to be neglected. In about 70 percent of child abuse or neglect cases, a parent’s abuse of alcohol or drugs exacerbates the abuse. More than 80 percent of children in the foster care system have developmental, emotional or behavioral problems, CWLA says.




Their stories

Richard H. of Springfield first adopted his daughter Andrea in 2003 at the age of 12. (Their names have been changed at Richard’s request to protect Andrea’s identity.)

Richard says he and his wife received a vague history about Andrea when they took her in, including that her biological parents were drug addicts and alcoholics. She had been through several failed foster care placements before she came to Richard’s family, though the adoptive parents weren’t told why those previous placements had failed.

Richard says he and his wife were told that Andrea had been diagnosed with attention deficit disorder and depression, which he says turned out to be wrong.

Richard says Andrea actually has reactive attachment disorder (RAD), a condition in which children who are denied emotional attention while very young find it difficult or impossible to trust anyone or form emotional bonds later in life. Richard says DCFS told a previous foster parent about the RAD diagnosis, but didn’t tell him and his wife.

“They didn’t tell us, because if they told us, they thought we wouldn’t take her,” Richard says.

When Andrea lived with Richard and his family, he says she ran away so often that he came to be on a first-name basis with the police dispatchers. Andrea skipped school often, vandalized Richard’s car and home, threatened his wife with a knife and tried to kill them. Andrea, now 18, has since moved out to live with a boyfriend, Richard says, adding that he still worries about her.

“I feel worst of all for her in all of this,” he says. “We still would have taken her if we had known about her history, but we would have educated ourselves. I kept sending complaint letters to the head of DCFS about the caseworker, because she (the caseworker) almost got us killed. She knowingly put a time bomb in our home, did not tell us, and then she walked away.”

Bernadine Long of Chicago first took in her adopted son, whom she asked to be identified only as “R.L.,” in 2000 at the age of 3 as a foster child. Even before Long fully adopted R.L. in 2007, he began acting out violently. R.L. has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder with schizophrenic tendencies, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and a learning disability, Long says.

“He’s very aggressive, very oppositional, very defiant,” Long says, adding that doctors have tried a handful of medications that briefly stabilized R.L.’s behavior. She says none of the medications worked for very long, nor did the variety of treatments and therapies recommended by DCFS.

Long says DCFS kept information about R.L.’s background from her prior to adoption, and she was given no indication when she first took him in as a foster child that he would exhibit violent behavior. His biological mother may have used drugs and alcohol during pregnancy, Long says, but Long didn’t find that out until her attorney was able to track down the information in 2011, after a clinical meeting that was held without her knowledge.

When R.L.’s caseworker first approached Long about adopting R.L., Long requested specialized help for him.

“I said we need more help for him before adoption, because I’m having trouble now getting sufficient services that would help him be able to remain in our home with us,” Long says. “They eventually started threatening me, saying, ‘If you don’t do this, we’re going to remove him from your home.’ I told them they might have to remove him because I’m not just going to sign some papers when I know he needs help.”



Long eventually obtained a signed agreement for specialized services for R.L. during a time of crisis. Those services never materialized, Long says.

“We still had the same problems in terms of getting help for him,” Long says. “I would call the caseworker and they would say I need to call an emergency crisis number, and they’d make an appointment to come out and see him. I’m like, ‘He’s having a crisis right now. What do we do now?’ I couldn’t get any help, so I ended up having to call the police.”

Long says she feels like she let her son down.

“I’m bitter and angry at the way DCFS treated me and my son, making all these promises and not carrying forth any of them,” Long says. She notes that R.L. tried three times to get her in trouble with DCFS by falsely reporting abuse. All three investigations came back unfounded, Long says.

 “My son tried to burn our house down, he hit, pushed and kicked my 80-year-old mother, and he has hit me and his brother, but you can’t really reach out to DCFS because they look at you like you’re the criminal. All I’m trying to do is get hope for my child so we can remain a family, remain together.”

Toni and James Hoy of Ingleside, Ill., first took in their adopted son Daniel in 1996 at age two. His biological mother may have used drugs or alcohol during pregnancy, Toni Hoy said, and he had been neglected by his biological parents. Daniel’s behavior became violent and aggressive, and at age 13 he pulled a knife on Toni Hoy, threw another child down a set of stairs and displayed other violent and aggressive behavior that made Hoy feel unsafe in her own home.

Hoy says she and her husband were not warned that Daniel might develop violent behavioral tendencies.

 “They told us he had been neglected, but they thought he was young enough that if he was in a good home, he would be just fine,” Hoy says. “Looking back and educating myself, when he was found, he was near death. He was a baby and his bodily organs were shutting down. For people who are educated about severe trauma like that, they would know that he was going to have PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).”

Hoy says she was surprised to learn that PTSD could develop in a baby that young, but she feels DCFS should have known.

“How could you find an infant in that condition and not know, if you were educated in clinical things?” Hoy says. “Part of it was clinical people knowing what these problems could look like down the road and not telling us, telling us instead that he’d be fine down the road once he was in a stable environment.”



When Daniel’s behavior became too dangerous for the Hoys to handle around age 13, they refused to pick him up from a mental hospital, hoping they could access Medicaid funds for Daniel’s long-term treatment. They instead faced a charge of neglect for not letting Daniel back into their home. The charge was eventually dropped, but Daniel became a ward of the state and was placed in a residential treatment facility.

 “They weren’t telling us the truth about being able to access treatment,” Hoy says of DCFS. “They said it would be painful to disrupt an adoption, but they told us they would provide treatment if necessary (under the adoption agreement). They let us believe our personal insurance or Medicaid would cover it.”

The Hoys sued to regain custody and secure funding for Daniel’s treatment. The state eventually agreed in a settlement to pay for Daniel’s treatment, and the Hoys regained custody, but he remains in residential care. [See “When adoption goes wrong,” Aug. 11, 2011.]

“I love the boys enough to see them through whatever issues they have,” Hoy says, referring to Daniel and her other adopted sons. “If I had known ahead of time that we were going to deal with the mental health issues we’re dealing with, I still would have taken them anyway, if we could get the support we needed. If I had known we would face that and not have the support, and face being labeled child abusers, absolutely not. It’s been three and a half years of trauma for us.”

Wally and Dawn Busch of Petersburg differ somewhat from other families interviewed by Illinois Times. The Busches say they were aware that their adopted son Alan, who they adopted at age two in 2000, had been abused by his biological mother, who they say abused alcohol and had mental health issues of her own. They weren’t surprised when Alan began to act out around the time he hit puberty. The Busches weren’t even surprised when they had to take Alan to a mental hospital because of his threats to kill other children at school, threats to hurt himself and the couple’s other children, and his self-mutilation.

What surprised the Busches is the response from Alan’s caseworker when it came time to pay for his mental health treatment. The Busches were told they had to apply for a certain state grant and be denied twice before DCFS would even consider accessing Medicaid to pay for expensive long-term treatment at a residential care facility. Wally Busch says applying for the grant and being denied twice was only meant to keep his family busy instead of asking about residential care.

Wally Busch says a caseworker also previously convinced them to put Alan in a foster care group home instead, where he would receive specialized services. Busch says Alan’s psychiatrist later found out no services were provided there. And despite Alan’s documented history of inappropriate contact with other children, the group home housed a three-year-old girl in foster care, he says.

“They did everything including lying to us,” Wally Busch says. “The adoption subsidy agreement we signed is full of broken promises. They told us they’d provide all these services, but the follow-through is where they really let Alan down.”




A complex, ever-changing system

Though their stories each differ slightly, these families’ experiences with DCFS raise questions about how the agency operates and about the effectiveness of communication between caseworkers and parents. DCFS spokesman Kendall Marlowe says caseworkers do their best to navigate an ever-changing system, but obstacles and unknown variables can make the job very complex.

“By definition, when we first encounter a child, we have no history whatsoever of their condition,” Marlowe says, explaining that the agency takes custody of children in a variety of parental situations. Some parents are uncooperative, while others aren’t even around to tell caseworkers about the child. “We understand that parents who are taking a child into their lives permanently need to know everything they can about a child, and we acknowledge our responsibility to work with them.”

Marlowe says even if caseworkers know that a child came from a home with abuse or neglect, what they can tell potential foster or adoptive parents is limited by privacy laws.

“We have to keep in mind that both the child and biological parents have a legal right to privacy,” he says. “We can only begin to give out this kind of information when a foster parent expresses interest in a child and begins to become involved in the child’s life.”

The changing nature of mental health conditions creates another obstacle for caseworkers, Marlowe says, because it makes prediction of dangerous behavior very difficult.

“Mental health conditions are not like a broken bone or an infection,” Marlowe says. “They are ever-changing and difficult to define, let alone treat. Even if a full and accurate assessment of a child is done at one point, a year later, that assessment may be utterly wrongheaded – not because of a problem with the first assessment, but because the child has changed. That’s particularly true in adolescence, where so many forces are changing a child’s body, brain and behavior.”

More broadly, he says, casework itself is a “tremendous challenge” because each situation is unique.

“We have specialists and supervisors to support our workers, but human beings are complex and ever-changing,” he says.

Marlowe addresses the perception by some families that DCFS caseworkers hold back information that might scare off potential parents by saying that’s simply not the case. DCFS went from having more than 52,000 children in its care in 1997 to just more than 15,000 now, he says, but the rate of disrupted adoptions has not increased as the agency has shifted toward more permanent placements.

Marlowe’s own parents adopted six foster children with varying degrees of emotional disturbances when he was growing up. He says that experience prepared him to be a foster parent himself, but every parent must ask themselves what they’re willing to deal with when adopting.

“When my wife and I came to it, I was able to honestly say I’ll take on the most severe psychological issues you’ve got,” he says. “However, medically complex cases blow my mind. I couldn’t be that kind of parent for five minutes. I think every parent has a unique ability to help certain kinds of children.”

Contact Patrick Yeagle at pyeagle@illinoistimes.com.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
Mr. Yeagle,
Thank you for sharing those families stories and what they have experienced with their children and in working with DCFS. Those families shared painful but truthful information about their lives and experiences. Pathetic that DCFS did not do the same. Sadly these stories are much more prevalent than people realize. Serious changes need to occur throughout DCFS, not just for the children in their care and custody but also in their communication and treatment of the families who are willing to foster and/or adopt them.

While I appreciate your interest in presenting both sides, I am greatly offended by the conclusion of your article whereby you allow Kendall Marlowe (spokesperson for DCFS) to side step the heart of the issues which were put forth by the families you interviewed.

It may be true that DCFS has SOME cases where there is not much historical information on the child/children however, such is not the case for ALL children that come into their care. Many of those children’s histories are well documented and it is DCFS’s job to track down the information. I don't work for DCFS yet I have obtained information from family members regarding foster kids histories! Furthermore the family members told me they provided that information to DCFS and upon further examination it was located in DCFS files (Texas case)!

A foster/adoptive parent becomes “involved” in a child’s life when they first allow the child to come live in their home even if it is on a temporary basis. How can there be safety for anyone when the pertinent information is not provided? Mr. Marlowe would have us believe that due to privacy laws they cannot provide a foster parent ANY information regarding the behavior or history of a child or why prior placements failed? So DCFS will place a sexually offending child or dangerous child into a foster home and not provide that information to the foster/adoptive family? That is a violation of the law and DCFS’s responsibility to protect the children in their care. Additionally they are knowingly placing the receiving family in harm’s way. I know of cases where DCFS has removed children from homes for these same circumstances, so why is it lawful for DCFS to commit this offense? Something is terribly wrong here.

The foster/adoptive family typically has a documented statement with DCFS about what they are willing to accept/deny regarding issues of the children they are considering. DCFS gets around this part by feigning ignorance of the problems. Mr. Marlowe would have you believe that it's just nearly impossible to diagnose or treat the problems of the kids. Seriously? I am insulted that Mr. Marlowe would expect anyone to believe that statement. I can assure you the majority of the foster/adoptive families have obtained evaluations and diagnosis for the children, so if they can get it done, why can’t DCFS? Has Mr. Marlowe ever heard of “annual check-ups”? Hello? When at risk or traumatized children have evaluations they truly don’t last forever. They have to continually be re-evaluated, at a minimum, annually depending on the problems.

I would like to know who in DCFS is lying. Mr. Marlowe stated that “the rate of disrupted adoptions has not increased as the agency has shifted toward more permanent placements.” A freedom of information request has been requested a few times of DCFS for the statistical information on the number of disrupted adoptions and the requestor was told that DCFS does not track that information. The obvious question is how would Mr. Marlowe know the rate of disrupted adoptions if the information isn’t tracked?

In closing, I know that DCFS has challenges in doing their jobs, but stop the BS already! They are not accurately portraying what occurs within their agency. We need to keep the heat on them and hold them accountable! No less is expected from the foster/adoptive parents or biological parents for that matter. Sometimes it seems that the animal organizations do a better job of evaluating and adopting out stray animals in homes than the job that DCFS does with children. Shameful indeed!


Regards,

Beverly Hansen

 

 
I get plenty suspicious whenever I see Reactive Attachment Disorder distorted to include violent or aggressive features. This is usually done by people who are proponents of a fringe practice called "Attachment Therapy." This fringe psychotherapy that uses coercive restraint, its highly authoritarian parenting methods, and the bogus RAD diagnosis have all denounced as abusive by APSAC and the American Psychological Association's Division on Child Maltreatment .

As defined in the DSM-IV-TR, children with the recognized RAD are either very withdrawn or overly friendly with unfamiliar people.

The bogus "RAD" (defined with a laundry list of signs) is a very easy diagnosis to obtain – from any "Attachment Therapist" – and it allows parents of adopted or foster children to collect special needs funding.

For more information, see the website of Advocates for Children in Therapy:
www.childrenintherapy.org

 

 

i recently read this article and was left with much disappointment. one of the first sentences reads .. " 9-year-old has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and other emotional disturbances that manifest in violent, destructive behavior at the slightest provocation." is the Illinoistimes going down in talent of their reporters? First off .. BiPolar Illiness is not a disease that a child can accurately come diagnosed with. However, sadly, Illinois ranks highest amongst the states where children are misdiagnosed and placed on medications to appease their care givers or sadly, where care givers are forced suggested to put their child on medications that severly alter the childs behaivor because schools, etc (DCFS included) "feel" the child is "acting out and not behaiving properly". These are things I wish the reporter would have touched on! In my opinion .. there is NO CHILD whom should be put on medications that are not FDA and had the reporter checked .. there is NOT ONE medication on the market that is approved for treatment of BiPolar illness that is also approved for children. WHY .. because they cause "violent and destructive behaivors" - wake up Illinois .. your children are being grossly neglected by the medical system and Hello .. Illinoistimes .. hire some better reporters.. because this one totally missed the mark on this story. Children need love and compassion .. NOT A PILL that is going to grossly alter their brains and cause them longterm damage that can never be repaired or reversed! The article should have read .. What is the Nanny State of Illinois doing to our children" ugh!

i have a very well documented supported story to share about all i have said if and when your willing to cover it ♥ just sayin :))

 

 
My Life as a Parent of a Traumatized, Attachment%u2010Disordered Child, by the Trauma Attachment Network

I’m giving you this letter because you have expressed an interest in my experience as a parent of a traumatized, attachment%u2010disordered child. It is not a story I relate to you lightly. My child has some very special needs and because of this, so do I. I need people to understand what our family faces, not just judge us as incompetent. It isn’t fair what happened to my child or to me. But it is what we are both facing, and we face it together everyday.

First, I’d like you to know that this letter was not written just by me. Parents from all over the country are using it to tell a uniquely tragic story. This letter isn’t the ranting of one isolated, overwhelmed, and oversensitive adult. I did not "do" this to my child. My child came to me this way. Chances are he would be struggling with these same behaviors and emotions in any family. My child's problems are not the result of poor parenting by me. In fact, parents of traumatized children are some of the most courageous, committed, resourceful, insightful, misunderstood and stressed%u2010out parents around. We are not just bellyachers. We are in fact, front%u2010line troops in the battle for civilization itself. If you think that’s somehow overinflated, consider the
statistics that most of today’s prison population was abused and/or neglected and many have attachment%u2010related emotional problems.

So here is what happened—when my child was a little baby, at the time he was most vulnerable, he did not get his basic needs met. Perhaps, he was not picked up when crying, not fed when hungry, left alone for hours, or left with various strangers for days. Perhaps he was beaten, shaken, or otherwise physically or sexually abused. Perhaps he had chronic or unmitigated pain due to medical procedures and had no way of communicating his distress. I might guess at these details of my child’s trauma, but I will never likely know the full truth. Because of this neglect and abuse, my child became traum atized and was convinced that he was going to die. He learned that he could not
trust anyone to meet his needs. And every day since, when my child wakes up in the morning, this deep%u2010seated anxiety gets reloaded. In order to survive, he has become unconsciously committed to never, ever being vulnerable again. He uses all of his basic survival intelligence to control an outside world he feels he cannot trust. All his existential energy is focused on keeping people far enough away so he won’t get hurt again, but close enough that they won’t leave him either. Unfortunately, he is never really satisfied with either proximity and is therefore constantly in a “push them away/pull them close” dilemma. As his adoptive (or foster or biological) parent, I live everyday in this no man’s land of damaged intimacy. I’ve been emotionally wounded from the many times I’ve tried to break through my child’s formidable defenses. Those who don’t need to get as close—teachers, relatives, neighbors, etc.—won’t experience the full intensity of these primal defenses. So if you are lucky enough to see him
withdraw or witness one of his rages, you are probably getting close—so good for you!

But if this does happen, please remember that you are witnessing a child stuck in a desperate fight for survival—he has become once again that scared, traumatized baby, absolutely convinced he has to control you and everything in the world in order to be safe. It can’t get more primal than that.

As his parent, I am dedicated to helping him realize that I am not his enemy. It is that stark, I’m afraid. But not hopeless. During these very difficult years, I have tried many approaches to parenting of my special child. The standard, traditional disciplinary approaches used by my parents were obviously tried first and were an instant failure.

Star charts and behavior%u2010based rewards came next, and they did not work either. I have tried using praise rather than criticism, bribery, ignoring destructive behaviors, created known%u2010in%u2010advance consequences listed on print%u2010outs. I’ve hired numerous specialists; cleared all possessions out his bedroom; taken away TV and computer privileges.

Nothing has changed his dangerous, self%u2010destructive behavior. His response is more primal, more subconscious, and has little to do with a situation or possessions involved. It has to do with the fear that’s triggered, the trust that was broken, the chaos he feels. It’s like he is having emotional seizure, as cascading brain chemistry takes him over. He doesn’t choose this – I don’t choose this—it just happens. So our days are mostly filled with emotional explosions and uneasy calms between the storms. When it does get
quiet, I’m nervous about when the next bomb will hit. Each day is filled with anxiety, fear, guilt, and shame for us both. It is like we’re living on an emotional minefield, and the mines keep regenerating, exploding again and again.
What I face daily is, that despite my best efforts to be a loving caregiver, my child’s early developmental trauma has created a discord that is a true paradox. For example, I may try to gently calm my upset child, but this is not experienced as soothing to him. So his trauma is triggered and he may withdraw, shut down or lash out. This causes me to get stressed as my child reacts counter to my intention. Now my stressful reaction starts to feel familiar, even “safe”, to him, so he works (often subconsciously) to expand this, and
we descend into deeper and deeper dysfunction and chaos. To my child’s traumainjured brain, this dysregulated feeling, which feels painful to healthy people, actually feels normal to him. And I’m left feeling stressed, angry, and emotionally spent. Absolute total consistency (at home and at school) does help somewhat. Parenting traumatized children like this is nothing like parenting emotionally healthy children. The responses you receive can be very unrewarding and punishing, since moments of closeness and intimacy are very rare and can trigger a trauma reaction. My beloved special child is often willing to do for others (even complete strangers) what he is not willing to do for me (this is another behavior common with attachment disorder).

The damage done due to early childhood trauma and not being able to safely attach to a trusted caregiver has left my child with the emotional development of a toddler or infant. But the big difference is that my child is not a toddler. He’s much older and knows how to swear, punch a hole in the wall, and swing his fists or feet to hurt others.

Imagine the terrible%u2010twos lasting for years and years, escalating in intensity and effect—I’m a parent of a 100 pound, physically coordinated, verbally adept, emotionally trigger%u2010happy baby. Imposing limits isn’t enough. My child must be helped to accept these limits and internalize the self%u2010regulation, self%u2010soothing, and self%u2010control required to do so. Rewards and punishments focus on the outside, observable behaviors, not the internal underlying process that creates these behaviors. At the same time, he does not need us to lower our expectations for either his behavior or his academic performance. What he
needs is help in accepting and reacting to these expectations with flexibility and selfcontrol.

He needs to restart the developmental process and move beyond an
emotional toddler. He needs to move out of this developmental disarray toward a more civilized, balanced inner process.Our family needs support, education and understanding. We did not expect that this would be our daily reality, and it isn’t easy. I may seem stressed, fearful or angry. I am frequently overwhelmed. I am making significant sacrifices so that my child can rise above the chaos of his trauma and find true hope and healing. We all have amazing abilities to adapt, as adversity can deepens us and perhaps this will be so for my child as
they confront deeply sealed wounds and transgressions. But we must go beyond intellectual definitions of “normal” and “cured” and think of it in another way: Can someone’s affliction, which has shut off various levels of meaning from their life, be mitigated enough to possibly reopen some of those channels? Or put another way, if left alone without special effort, will these kids descend into more and more chaos?

Clearly, the answer to both questions is yes. Therefore, the effort and sacrifice I’m making in my life for him, and the help you are now hopefully willing to give me, is of great value. Help me help my child realize the true blessing life can be.

Thank you for reading this.

 

Thankyou for posting your heartwrenching story of daily life with your adopted child. I think God led me to find your post at a moment of despair when I felt that no-one could understand what I was going through. You totally described my day with my 11 yr old son whom I love very much but feel helpless as his mom. I became Brandens adopted foster parent when he was six months old and he had been neglected, malnurished and abused to the point of hopitization and broken bones. His immune system shut down and he spent the next year in and out of hospital. At less than two years old he described as hyperactive and was attending a sleep clinic. The terrible twos have never gone away except in school and with strangers or out of home environments where he is withdrawn and has trouble fitting in and making friends. Our terrible two tantrums lasted for hours on end at a time. Still do. Insecurities are a major problem especially at night. We are only starting to get some undisturbed sleep at night this last year and he is now 11 yrs old. I totally feel and relate to your need for people to understand. I have had three other children but it only now that I feel a failure as a parent. I want to help him heal and know that he is loved and precious too but everyday is a battle that he dosent even know he is battling.
Thankyou for sharing your precious story and may God Bless you and your child. I know He blessed me to read it at a moment when I felt very much alone, overwhelmed and abandoned by the rest of the "normal parenting" world. Thankyou

 

 

I recently read the article Who are We Adopting in an issue of Illinois Times. I was astonished to read about the experiences with DCFS that these families have gone through. These families shared their struggling encounters with DFCS when it came to the illnesses their adoptive children had that they were not aware of. I believe it should be a policy that the adoption agencies inform the future parents of the child’s past. This is critical that the parents have an overall knowledge of the child’s past and how the birth parents treated them so they do not put their own family in jeopardy and they are well prepared to handle the future.
The article mentioned something along the lines of disclosing information such as violent behavior or previously abused children could lead people away from adopting the child and jeopardize their future to be a part of a family, but what about jeopardizing the adopting family? Tammy Herstad put her family in jeopardy by not knowing Adams diagnoses prior to adopting him. She states that, Adam destroys things and even stabs things with his brother’s diabetes syringes. I am not saying that Adam would harm a family member, but there is a high possibility it could happen. Another example for what could happen to families is shown in the documentary, Child of Range. This documentary is disturbing, but is it another example of parents not knowing the past of their adopted child.
Luckily, some agencies have been held accountable by the court system in “wrongful adoption” due to misrepresenting or concealing a child’s background history to the adoptive parents. Since 1986, wrongful adoptions lawsuits have been filed. Although, sometimes background information is not available for all children in all agencies; I believe it is that agency’s duty to gather that information whether it be through previous foster parents or medical testing. Children available for adoption should have sufficient background information gather before the adoption process is completed so parents know what they could potentially get into.