• Sat
    25
  • Sun
    26
  • Mon
    27
  • Tue
    28
  • Wed
    29
  • Thu
    30
  • Fri
    31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Commentary / Politics - Rich Miller /  Quinn makes shameful cuts to child care
. . . .
Thursday, February 10,2011

Quinn makes shameful cuts to child care

By Rich Miller

The state’s Secretary of Human Services met with a group representing child-care providers Jan. 31 and gave them some bad news. Prepare for $100 million in cuts to child-care programs, Secretary Michelle Saddler told the group.

According to a participant in the meeting, Secretary Saddler said the state could freeze intake of new clients, “dramatically” increase parental co-pays, cut rates to providers and eliminate child care for parents who are in school or employment-related training. The meeting resulted in an urgent alert by Illinois Action for Children imploring supporters to immediately call the governor’s office.

The $100 million cut would be for the rest of the fiscal year, which ends June 30. That cut would equal about a third of the child-care program’s remaining budget, which comes from both state and federal revenue sources.

After initially refusing to confirm that the Secretary of Human Services had warned activists about that impending $100 million cut to child-care programs, the governor’s budget office finally shed some light on the matter later in the week.

The cuts are not “new” cuts, according to the budget office. Instead, a spokesperson claimed, these are cuts which were ordered last year and are just now being implemented.

So, in other words, the Quinn administration waited until after the election and after the tax hike was passed to implement huge cuts to a program for mostly poor, single-mother families. And because the administration waited so long, the cuts are now more than twice as deep as they would’ve been had they been executed at the start of the fiscal year last July.

But, of course, making those cuts last summer would have hurt Quinn with his core constituencies and he needed every possible vote he could get. Women, the poor, minorities and liberal voters would have been outraged by major cuts to child-care programs, which help poor families get on their feet. Now, they can all be safely tossed overboard. The election is over. Liberals and minorities in the House and Senate almost all voted for the income tax hike, believing that the worst cuts were behind them. The deed is done, so the cuts can now be announced.

David Ormsby, a public relations consultant, claimed last week that Secretary Saddler’s department is looking at perhaps $400 million in overall cuts – equal to ten percent of her department’s entire budget.

But since the fiscal year is more than half over, a ten percent budget cut to DHS now would be equal to more than a 20 percent reduction in the department’s remaining outlays. Gov. Quinn sharply criticized state Sen. Bill Brady on the campaign trail last year for proposing an across-the-board cut of 10 percent, but Quinn is apparently planning to double that amount in one of the departments which he has claimed he holds dear.

And to add insult to injury, Gov. Quinn is encouraging groups and businesses which have contracts with the Department of Human Services to lobby legislators for a long-term borrowing plan to pay off the state’s past-due bills. The state owes service providers billions of dollars because it didn’t have the cash to pay them on time until the tax hike passed. Many of those providers work in the human service field. So, now Quinn wants them to work to get the money they’re owed while simultaneously eviscerating their funding.

The word “chutzpah” comes to mind.

Look, the state didn’t have enough revenues to pay for the programs it had for the past few years. That’s why we were in such a hole. And everybody at the Statehouse knew that budget cuts would have to happen even after the income tax rate was increased.

But concealing cuts to child care, of all things, until after the election and after that tax hike vote is just downright shameful.

Some think Gov. Quinn is trying to create panic by announcing these cuts and then using that angst as leverage to find legislative votes for his borrowing plan. He’s done this sort of thing before, only to back off at the last minute. But using poor single moms as human shields would not be his finest hour, to say the least. This whole thing makes me sick to my stomach.

Rich Miller publishes Capitol Fax, a daily political newsletter, and thecapitolfaxblog.com.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 

PLEASE!! This program is ripe with misuse. There are countless mothers who work part time jobs that get full time daycare, there are moms that sign up for classes (get loans and grants) then never go to school who get this program. There are people who don't work OR go to school that get free daycare. Look at the books very, very few ever get off of this, they just cling on until their children get to school. And please show me where daycare is a "right" for people? Why on Earth are MY hard earned dollars going to pay for daycare for other peoples children?? This is a ridiculous pie-in-the-sky program that never should have been started. The few that have actually needed it and used it and got off of all government programs are outweighed by the many who just produce more and more children who are sucked into the shamefull cycle of entitlement. You know that at Lawrence they actually have classes for girls on how to get this program, housing, LINK, etc. before they even get pregnant!! It actually teaches girls the incentives of having children with absolutely no way to support them. By the way check the last birthing stats for Illinois, 44% of births in Illinois take place out of wedlock. In Springfield it is just over 50% with the black community up to a whopping 81% born out of wedlock (the state of IL is at 79% out of wedlock for black women/girls). These are FACTS check out the Dept of Public Health website. SORRY but I do not think I should be footing the bill for 44% of the state's children's daycare, food, housing, etc. This shows a breakdown in our culture and it is supported by these crazy programs. If it were harder to raise these children and not a career choice to pop out kids, maybe even restore a little shame to it, then maybe more of our of all money could saty in our pockets.

 

My dear friend, Let me help you to put the logic together. If we stop daycare, a mother has to quit her job to stay home and to take care of her kid. Without any other income, the mother will DEFINITELY go to ask for unemployment and other health care related benefits. The total amount of payment by the government will DEFINITELY greatly outweigh the current childcare payment to the family. Where does the money come from? It is from tax payers such as you and me. Now, do you want the government to pay $300 per month to the mother or you want it to pay $600 to her? You do the math. Also, you mention that "there are countless mothers who work part time jobs that get full time daycare." Where did you get the number "countless" from? As far as I know, it is nearly impossible to apply for daycare service if a parent doesn't work full time.

 

Who can receive these services? In addition to helping low-income, working families, the Child Care Assistance Program also serves: * Families who are receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and participating in education & training in accordance with their responsibility and service plans (RSP); * Teen parents seeking a high school degree or its equivalent; and/or * Families not receiving TANF, who are pursuing additional education to improve their job opportunities. People who need cash assistance may qualify for one of several programs. Here you will find short descriptions of programs that are available. * Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program helps pregnant women and families with one or more dependent children with temporary cash and other benefits. TANF can help pay for food, shelter, utilities, and expenses other than medical. What is the purpose of this service? The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program provides temporary financial assistance for pregnant women and families with one or more dependent children. TANF provides financial assistance to help pay for food, shelter, utilities, and expenses other than medical. Who can receive these services? To qualify for TANF, a person must: * Be pregnant or have a child under age 19 who lives with them. A child who is 18 must be a full-time high school student. A pregnant woman (and her husband, if he lives with her) may qualify for help, even if they don't have any other children. * Live in Illinois. You can be homeless and still qualify. * Be a U.S. citizen or meet certain immigration requirements. * Develop a plan for becoming self-sufficient and follow it. So as they say themselves if you don't work, have a kid out of wedlock, and come up with a base plan on how to get out of this you will qualify for cash, food, housing,daycare, and medical. I guess that beats the heck out of being responsible. Just have a kid and now you and your family are off the hook for feeding housing caring for and even watching the kid, just go to classes occassionally and it is all handed to you, I can't imagine why so many girls are getting pregnant so soon and getting places of their own on my dime, I mean hey, we make it so hard for them.........

 

 
IMO

I am a home daycare provider. I have a family with 3 children. The mother, 27 years old, is going to nursing school full time and the school is an hour away. she is also working full time. people like that deserve a little help. not all families that get assistance are working the system. mothers that sign up for daycare assistance have got to have proof, and good proof, of their work and schooling. they almost have to jump through hoops to get daycare approved. they also have to turn in their grades showing they are going to school. parents that are doing their share of helping themselves deserve a little help to get on their feet. if daycare payments are cut, not only with the family that need daycare have to quit their jobs and get on full time state assistance, but so will the daycare providers. so 2 families will then need full time state assistance.....now do the math.