• Sat
    18
  • Sun
    19
  • Mon
    20
  • Tue
    21
  • Wed
    22
  • Thu
    23
  • Fri
    24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / News /  Federal auditors visit Jerome
. . . .
Thursday, July 5,2012

Federal auditors visit Jerome

Village financial records scrutinized

By Bruce Rushton

U.S. Department of Justice auditors spent two days in Jerome last week reviewing how the village has handled federal Drug Enforcement Administration grants.

The auditors declined to identify themselves.

“I’m not at liberty to say,” one of the two auditors told a reporter who asked what agency employed him.

However, several sources, including Mayor Harry Stirmell, confirmed that the auditors were in Jerome to examine how the village has handled DEA grants. They arrived at the village on Wednesday morning and were still in village offices when the village board met at 7 p.m. on Thursday.

“I talked with them briefly,” Stirmell said. “But I can’t report on anything.”

Stirmell said that the auditors asked that he not disclose the nature of the conversation.

“It’s just a routine audit that they do,” Stirmell said. “They’re traveling auditors. They go everywhere.”

Stirmell said that he didn’t know whether auditors had discovered anything questionable.

“They’re still working,” Stirmell said. “I can’t tell you if they found anything amiss or not.”

Stirmell said he that he could not say how much money the village has received in federal DEA grants.

“To be honest with you, I don’t know how much,” Stirmell said.

Stirmell spoke after a brief village board meeting in which the board gave final approval to a revised budget designed to keep a police officer on the payroll who had previously been laid off due to a lack of funds. Stirmell has said that the village has spent more than it has taken in during the past two years and that the deficit spending can’t continue.

Recent board meetings have been crowded with residents asking questions about village finances and demanding that the police department be kept intact. Two Sangamon County sheriff’s deputies stood by during Thursday’s meeting, but decorum prevailed during the session that lasted less than five minutes.

The federal audit of funds received by the village police department comes after Steven Stirmell, the mayor’s son and a former Jerome police officer, was charged two weeks ago with obstruction of justice and official misconduct. Prosecutors with the Sangamon County state’s attorney’s office say that the former officer filed a false report on the March arrest of Kathleen Vehovic, a village resident who is the daughter of former Sangamon County Democratic Party chairman Todd Renfrow.

Two weeks after arresting Vehovic on suspicion of driving under the influence, Stirmell submitted a report to the state’s attorney’s office stating that she had put a Listerine tablet in her mouth prior to submitting to a breath test, which showed a blood-alcohol content of more than .15 percent. The legal limit is .08 percent.

A video of Vehovic’s arrest shows that Stirmell asked her whether she had anything in her mouth before he administered the breath test after pulling her over for driving without headlights shortly before midnight. Stirmell also promised to give Vehovic a break prior to administering the test.

“You blow a .10 or below, you go home,” the officer tells Vehovic. “We’ll have somebody come here and pick you up.”

Stirmell in the video shows extraordinary courtesy to a woman who asks the officer what her insurance card looks like and can’t remember that she has given him her driver’s license minutes after handing it over.

Vehovic several times asks if she can call someone to ask whether she should take the breath test, but Stirmell says no. Nonetheless, Vehovic dials her cell phone from the driver’s seat while Stirmell stands next to the open driver’s window. Even in the midst of her first attempt at the breath test – she has to try several times before producing a sufficient volume of air for analysis – Vehovic has someone on her cell phone providing advice.

Vehovic had a broken leg and was using crutches at the time of her arrest. Rather than taking her to jail, Stirmell allowed her to go home.

“I don’t think that it’s fair for you to go to jail, especially with your leg like that,” Stirmell tells her.

Contact Bruce Rushton at brushton@illinoistimes.com.

 Click here to see the Videotaped arrest of Kathleen Vehovic.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
The Agents were probably from DEA's Office of Professional Regulation (Their Internal Affairs) They periodically audit field offices for compliance to their regulations. I have never heard of them auditing an agency (town/city) that assigns an officer to their task force though. Also DEA doesn't give towns grants. My guess is that the audit relates to Money Jerome received from asset forfeitures. Money received from asset forfeitures have restrictions on how the money can be used. The forfeiture money is intended to used for drug related investigations or equipment used to investigate drug crimes, there has to be some nexus to drug investigations to use the money . If my memory serves me, I don't believe forfeiture money can be used to pay salaries, which may be whats at issue here.

 

 
Apparently Pacman does not no the law. According to Section A, 2., (4) of the Guide to Equitable Sharing, Salary of an Officer hired to replace an officer assigned to a task force, "When a law enforcement agency assigned a law enforcement officer to a task force for a period of at least one year or the life of the task force and hires a new law enforcement officer to replace the officer so assigned, the agency may pay the salary and benefits of the replacement officer from equitably shared funds so long as the replacement officer does not engage in the seizure of assets or narcotics law enforcement as a principal duty." Based on this Guide, it definitely appears that the Village of Jerome is in total compliance.

 

I stand corrected, I guess my memory failed me. But my hunch is it still relates to asset forfeiture money.

 

 
Clearly Jerome has not used any DEA money for police or anyone else's salaries. We know this because if you review the village's budget, which is a public record, we find that all salaries are paid from money which is budgeted in the village's general revenue fund. Money in the general revenue fund is fully accounted for because it is received from sales tax and other tax proceeds.

 

So is there a line item in the police budget for asset forfeiture money?

 

 
Was the guy standing in the back corner one of the federal auditors?

 

 
I believe that the money from seized assets is put into a separate account for Federal money, it is not a budgeted item. Money from that account can only be used for police items, such as the salary and benefits of the replacement officer, purchasing items such as a police car, vests, computers for police cars, etc. According to Jerome's budget, this is not a budgeted line item.